Ok...

Sorry about that. I really really really meant to post. But it has been a busy week.

First, I did get the job in Germany. I will be leaving on Mar 7th. If you know where the house is, there will be a "Kiss my butt Goodbye" party on the 28th of Feb. If you don't know where the house is, that means you are not invited. Unless I have known you for more than a year.....then call me for directions.

In other news, I am once again stuck out of town for my current job. Only this time Significant other is stuck out of town with her job too. That means MIL is watching the kids. I am so glad that this is SO's last run.

Oh well, there is an update. More to follow.

In other news

I am busy as, well, as busy as a programmer with 3 projects due by the end of next week. I promise to give an update on life, the universe, and everything either tonight or tomorrow.

I Got Nothin

*Ahem*

Now Class, who Brings a Knife to a Gun Fight?


That's right....the Loser

One step closer to the brink

The Government has my papers, I have my offer. All I need now is permission to proceed.

I got nothin

Here. You read it.

In other news

Go take this quiz on common sense gun-control laws.

You may just learn something.

Why are they even talking?

Here is why you don't try the "appeasement" route with terror organizations and countries that back terrorism.

Short version: "Closing Gitmo not enough, close ALL of your detainment facilities and pay us for our time"

umm...yeah....not so much

And why are Afgani and Pakistani "Human Rights" organizations and former terror suspects even allowed to weigh in on this? That is like asking a man on death row how the death penalty should be applied. Why don't we ask people from Mumbai, or survivors of the USS Cole and 9/11 attacks if all, some, or any of our detention facilities should be closed. Or try this question:

"Mr. or Ms. Fire/Police/EMS/New Yorker/American, if depriving a suspected terrorist of sleep for 2 days and not letting him read his Qu'ran for a week or so would have yielded information that may have prevented the attacks on the WTC, would you be in favor of this treatment?"

If the answer is in the negative, I would question whether or not the person being asked met the criteria implicit in the addressing of the question.